This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this folio. Terms of use.

Intel took the wraps off its 8th Generation CPU core with AMD Radeon integrated graphics today. It'south a historical effect for more than than one reason. Start, the new CPUs are likely to set up a new loftier water marking for integrated graphics performance. Second, the new chips represent the first fourth dimension AMD and Intel have ever collaborated in this type initiative. It'southward a testament to how much the marketplace has inverse that this happened in the outset identify — fifty-fifty 10 years ago, the idea of an AMD-Intel alliance would've been unthinkable.

Intel is launching a suite of v new CPUs to introduce its new combined GPU+CPU core. All of these chips are Kaby Lake-derived, with iv cores and eight threads.

Intel-CES-2

At that place are some really interesting takeaways in this chart. First, bank check out the ROP counts on the ii Vega variants on display here. The i7-8809G and i7-8709G pack 1,536 GPU cores, clock speeds but a bit under 1.2GHz, and 64 ROPs. That's a huge number of ROPs for an integrated core — significantly more, in fact, than AMD uses in its own Ryzen Mobile 2700U. As expected, overall memory bandwidth is above 200GB/s, which puts the bit in Polaris' weight class in that regard.

The CPUs themselves are no slouch. The three.1GHz base clock is relatively depression, merely boosting up to 4.1GHz should better overall operation and most games don't scale particularly well with college CPU clocks.

Intel-CES-6

The GPU is attached to the CPU past an x8 PCIe 3.0 connection. Unlike the interposer technology that has made working with HBM and HBM2 hard, Intel'due south solution uses its own EMIB mounting technology that doesn't crave an interposer layer. The 4GB HBM2 stack (mutual to all of these chips) cuts ability consumption by 80 percent compared with GDDR5.

Intel-CES-7

While they aren't based on Coffee Lake, these new chips are notwithstanding a big step forward for Intel. Integrating EMIB on consumer products, building a 24 CU GPU cadre with one,536 GPU cores in total is a job Intel hasn't taken on earlier. And these fries now support 9 displays thanks to the combined Radeon+Intel graphics hardware. Intel is leaving its own graphics cadre enabled for consumers who desire to use QuickSync or need to build a giant wall of monitors. As for operation, Intel's numbers look extremely strong.

Intel-CES-4

Don't just wait at the bars — check what Intel is comparing against. The GTX 1060 Max-Q is a potent mobile GPU, merely Intel claims the Vega GPU onboard its own NUC systems and in rigs coming from companies like HP and Dell can beat it.

Intel-CES-5

In that location are two flavors of Vega onboard these Intel chips. The GH (Graphics High) version beats out the GTX 1060 Max-Q, according to Intel. The GL (Graphics Low) version, meanwhile, is capable of taking on the GTX 1050.

These fries are a watershed moment, non simply for Intel or AMD, but for the entire concept of integrated graphics. Ever since GPUs went on-die, nosotros've seen two schools of idea emerge. 1 of them (generally favored past Intel) is that integrated graphics should however amend over time, but consumers won't particularly favor it. About people desire inexpensive, acceptable graphics and don't intendance if they become annihilation else. People who desire higher-end solutions will buy them in the form of detached GPUs.

The other argument, generally favored by AMD, is that putting higher-stop graphics solutions into CPUs and focusing on improving operation over time will eventually make these chips highly-seasoned to segments of the marketplace that would currently favor a discrete GPU. We haven't really gotten to run across this theory tested, even so — AMD's Bulldozer-derived APUs were so weak on the CPU front, they killed any risk of a reasonable marketplace test.

If these fries testify popular with enthusiasts looking for a midrange, low-cost, burn down-and-forget solution, it'll say a great deal virtually what the market for these college-TDP parts looks similar and whether HBM2 can be a feasible solution in this space. Wait Intel and AMD to keep a very shut middle on how this pans out.